Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hughes

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1958No. 6331PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an action to reestablish a lost instrument and for damages for its breach. Appellant alleges that he assigned two certain oil and gas leases to appellee pursuant to the terms of an agreement expressed in a letter written by appellee to him, and allegedly lost. The terms of the agreement are alleged to be substantially as follows:

“A. In consideration of the assignment to defendant of the said leases, plaintiff would thereafter retain and continue to own an undivided one-fourth interest in each of the said leases, and defendant would recognize such ownership, although…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John v. Rowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Feddersen Motors, Inc. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Chambers and Company, a Partnership Composed of J. J. Chambers and J. J. Chambers, Jr. v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Mark Whelan v. New Mexico Western Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Ginn v. MacAlusoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dominguez v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Morris v. Miller & Smith Mfg. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Rael v. American Estate Life Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Simon v. AkinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Transformer Division v. Electric City Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API