Hamilton v. Hughes
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
This is an action to reestablish a lost instrument and for damages for its breach. Appellant alleges that he assigned two certain oil and gas leases to appellee pursuant to the terms of an agreement expressed in a letter written by appellee to him, and allegedly lost. The terms of the agreement are alleged to be substantially as follows:
“A. In consideration of the assignment to defendant of the said leases, plaintiff would thereafter retain and continue to own an undivided one-fourth interest in each of the said leases, and defendant would recognize such ownership, although…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John v. Rowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Feddersen Motors, Inc. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Chambers and Company, a Partnership Composed of J. J. Chambers and J. J. Chambers, Jr. v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Mark Whelan v. New Mexico Western Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Ginn v. MacAlusoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dominguez v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Morris v. Miller & Smith Mfg. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Rael v. American Estate Life Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Simon v. AkinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Transformer Division v. Electric City Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.