Legal Opinion
Jenks v. Menard
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 31, 2000No. 98-451PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The plaintiffs, Edward F. and Edith Record Jenks, appeal the Superior Court’s {Smith, J.) decision to grant the defendants’, Gerard Menard, Jr., Margaret Menard, and Deborah S. Olsen, motion for judgment on the pleadings and motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ refiled writ. They contend the dismissal of their first writ was not a judgment on the merits, and, therefore, pursuant to RSA 508:10 (1997), they could refile their original writ as a new action. We affirm.
The parties have agreed to the following facts. The plaintiffs and defendants own adjacent parcels of land in Lyme that share a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- ERG, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Belcher v. PaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Buckingham v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Barton v. BartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- LaChance v. United States Smokeless Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Rayeski v. Gunstock AreaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Dillon v. Select Portfolio, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Banerjee v. WilmotDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016
- Riverbend Condo Association v. Groundhog Landscaping and Property Maintenance, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020