Legal Opinion

Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. City of Columbus

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 12, 1927No. 362PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

The complainant, the Columbus Gas & Fuel Company, owns a natural gas distributing plant in the city of Columbus, Ohio, and together with its predecessors in ownership has furnished natural gas as a public utility to the general public of Columbus, through the instrumentality of such distribution system, for something over 20 years. The gas which is and has been so furnished is purchased at the city gates, from a producing and transportation company, under a contract operative for a period of 20 years from the 1st day of April, 1914, and providing for the payment, in so…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. McQuaidCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Quist v. DudaNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. International Ry. Co. v. PrendergastDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
  4. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KennellySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
  5. Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API