Vlietstra v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Jeffrey A. Vliets-tra was convicted of four counts of Receiving Stolen Property, a Class D felony.1 Upon appeal, Vlietstra presents several issues for our review, which we restate as: (1) whether the trial court improperly admitted hearsay evidence; and (2) whether the evidence is sufficient to support Vliets-tra's convictions.
We reverse.2
The record reveals that in the spring of 2001, Vlietstra told Richard Newenhouse that he had some John Deere tractors which he wished to sell. Mr. Newenhouse had previously purchased a Jeep from Vlietstra.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- State v. BuckTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. James Leland JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Dillingham v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- S.G. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Ramon Castillo-Salgado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
- SG v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.