Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ohio Roundtable, Inc. v. Taft

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1996No. 96-2027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators claim that they are entitled to the requested extraordinary relief in mandamus pursuant to Section lg, Article II and Section 1, Article XVI of the Ohio Constitution. However, relators are not entitled to the requested relief because they failed to comply with the constitutional time requirement for bringing an action to challenge the ballot language of a proposed constitutional amendment.

Section lg, Article II of the Ohio Constitution provides:

*644“ * * * The secretary of state shall cause to be placed upon the ballots, the ballot language for any such law, or proposed law, or proposed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Cramer v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Cappelletti v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Committee for Proposed Ordinance to Repeal Ordinance No. 146-02 v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Roundtable, Inc. v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API