Legal Opinion
State v. Cavett
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 2, 2015No. 14-124PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Dooley, J.
Defendant appeals the decision of the Chittenden Superior Court concluding that he violated the condition of his probation requiring him to complete the Vermont Treatment Program for Sexual Abusers (VTPSA). The court found that defendant failed to complete the required program, but it refused to review the underlying disciplinary action of the Department of Corrections (DOC) that resulted in defendant’s removal from the program. We reverse the court’s conclusion that it had no jurisdiction to review the DOC’s decision and remand the matter for the court to conduct the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rheaume v. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Inman v. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- State v. CoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- State v. MasseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Inman v. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Amanda L. StuartSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. CavettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Mongeon Bay Properties, LLC v. Mallets Bay Homeowner's Assn., Inc. and Anthony J. Sineni IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. Austin R. BurnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Mongeon Bay Properties, LLC v. Mallets Bay Homeowner's Assn., Inc. and Anthony J. Sineni IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2017