Legal Opinion

Inman v. Pallito

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 11, 2013No. 12-382PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff Daniel Inman appeals the superior court judgment granting the State of Vermont’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying judicial review of the Department of Corrections (DOC)’s decision to terminate his participation in the Incarcerative Domestic Abuse Treatment Program (InDAP). We affirm.

¶ 2. The following basic facts are undisputed. Plaintiff is an inmate serving a twenty-six-month to eight-year sentence for aggravated assault and escape in the Northern State Correctional Facility, which is administered by the DOC.

¶ 3. The DOC’s InDAP program…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rheaume v. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Vermont Criminal Justice Training CouncilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Sanborn v. WeirSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. State v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amratlal C. Bhagat v. Bharat A. Bhagat (068312)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Inman v. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. Maple Run Unified School District v. Vermont Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Island Industrial, LLC v. Town of Grand IsleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. Zachary Rose v. Michael Touchette, Commissioner, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API