Legal Opinion

Hoar v. City of Yonkers

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1946PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The plaintiff, a member of the Firemen’s Pension Fund of the City of Yonkers, by his complaint in the present action demands a declaratory judgment which will determine his pension rights. By a counterclaim interposed in their answer the defendants also demand a judgment declaring the plaintiff’s pension rights which are pleaded on a basis different than that asserted by the plaintiff. After a reply had been served cross motions by the plaintiff and the defendants were made under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings. The order made at Special Term, which…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Peters v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kraus v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Wash. Fed'n of State Employees Council 28 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. McDermott v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API