Legal Opinion

Felice Napolitano v. Compania Sud Americana De Vapores, Also Known as Chilean Line, Felice Napolitano v. Compania Sud Americana De Vapores, Also Known as Chilean Line

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 26, 1970No. 33961_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

421 F.2d 382

21 A.L.R.Fed. 940

Felice NAPOLITANO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES, also known as Chilean

Line, Defendant-Appellant.

Felice NAPOLITANO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES, also known as Chilean

Line, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 325 and 326, Dockets 33960 and 33961.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 3, 1969.

Decided Jan. 26, 1970.

Martin Lassoff, Zimmerman & Zimmerman, New York City, for appellee.

George S. Evans, John L. Quinlan, Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for appellant.

Before WATERMAN, HAYS and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Arthur Clark v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Edward Davis v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API