Legal Opinion

Linton v. Coupe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure;

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.: .

This is a submitted controversy as authorized by section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff made a map of- his tract of land in the city of Brooklyn^ and laid out lots thereon by the proposed streets of the city map. Thereafter, he conveyed to the defendant’s predecessor in title a lot on the northwesterly corner of Ridgewood and Shepherd avenues with reference to his map, but he did not convey any part of either avenue. These avenues were dedicated and for many years have been used and are now used as public streets. Each is sixty feet wide, of which width thirty…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. City of New York v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Dougherty v. . Village of HorseheadsNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Van Brunt v. . Town of FlatbushNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barker v. A. I. Namm & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hayton v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API