Legal Opinion

Jetton v. Polk

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 27, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownoyer, J.

This was an action by the administrator against Polk and ITardcastle for damages for the death of James R. Jetton, Jr., caused by an automobile collision. The recovery, if any, should go to the father, James R. Jetton, Sr., as surviving parent.

Defendants pleaded the general issue of not guilty and also filed a special plea, as follows:

“Permission of the court having heretofore been obtained to file this amended plea, the defendants, for further plea, say that they made claim against James R. Jetton, Sr., and/or the estate of James R. Jetton, Jr., deceased, for the damage done to their car…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. Union Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Scates v. SandeferTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Burnham v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Woodfin v. InselCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. City of Chattanooga v. BallewCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  3. Foremost Dairies Inc. v. Campbell Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fikes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API