Legal Opinion

People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 9, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 12SC835PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

11 In this dependency and neglect case, we hold that section 19-8-507(5)(a), C.R.S. (20183), permits parents, grandparents, and relatives to intervene as a matter of right. We further hold that section 19-8-507(5)(a)'s three-month time requirement does not apply to parents, grandparents, or relatives. We accordingly affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

I. Facts and Procedural History

12 A Petition in Dependency and Neglect was filed in April 2010 a few days after 0.C.'s birth,. The next month, 0.C. was removed from her parents' care because of concerns that her mother was not adequately…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. A.M. v. A.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Expedia, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. RamirezColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Samuel J. Stoorman & Associates, P.C. v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  4. Triple Crown at Observatory Village Ass'n v. Village Homes of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People in the Interest of J.GSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API