Legal Opinion
United States v. McCarty
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 2011No. 09-10504PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The government’s Motion to Amend footnote 6 in the Opinion that is cited at 648 F.3d 820, 2011 WL 3319428 (9th Cir. August 3, 2011) is granted, but only for the limited purpose of amending the third sentence of footnote 6 to read: “On appeal, the government did not contend this search of the second bag was a lawful administrative search or contest suppression of any evidence found therein on a basis independent of its main arguement.”
No subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be accepted for filing.
OPINION
HAWKINS, Senior Circuit Judge:
The competing interests of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bravo v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Charles PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Victor OrozcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Eddie McClendonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Mark JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.