Legal Opinion

State v. Getty

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 7, 1989No. 21786-1-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

The State appeals a dismissal of its charge of first degree malicious mischief against Frank B. Getty, a juvenile. The State argues that the trial court erred when it found that Getty had also been charged in adult court because a police officer issued an adult citation form when he arrested Getty. We reverse.

Facts

Renton police arrested Getty on July 24, 1987, for damaging private property with a B.B. gun. Getty was 17 years old at the time. The arresting officer cited Getty with malicious mischief in the third degree and issued a Washington Uniform Citation/Complaint Form which directed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  2. State v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. City of Seattle v. BonifacioWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. TeemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API