Legal Opinion

Anchor Stove & Range Co. v. Rymer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1938No. 7924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The cause is here for the second time. In our former decision Rymer v. Anchor Stove & Range Co., 6 Cir., 70 F.2d 386, we adjudged the present appellees guilty of unfair competition in simulating the design of appellant’s heaters, which were sold to the mail order house of Montgomery Ward & Company of Chicago, without sufficient indicia thereon to show their origin, and affirmed a decree granting the plaintiffs injunctive relief and reference to a master to assess damages.

Upon the first appeal no complaint was made with respect to the remedy decreed below, nor was it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. United States v. Bitter Root Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Dickinson v. O. & W. THUM CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. Haeger Potteries, Inc. v. Gilner PotteriesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. John T. Lloyd Laboratories, Inc. v. Lloyd Brothers Pharmacists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. National Distillers Products Corp v. K. Taylor Distilling Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1940
  5. Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. United Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API