Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Sexual Assault/Spouse Abuse Research Center, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 28, 2010No. MJG-09-3404PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
This Memorandum and Order addresses Defendants Sexual Assault/Spouse Abuse Research Center, Inc. (“SARC”), Luiza Caiazzo-Nutter, and Stephanie Powers’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas, ECF No. 43; Plaintiff Patrick Richardson’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Quash Subpoenas; ECF No. 44; Plaintiffs Supplemental and Updated Response to Defendants’ Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Request for Oral Arguments, ECF No. 48; and Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoenas, ECF No. 49.1 I find that a hearing is unnecessary in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. Braddick, Joe R. Brown v. Britt O. BraddickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Clawson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richardson v. Sexual Assault/Spouse Abuse Resource Center, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Charles Campbell v. John Mbah, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Dean v. Integrace, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Nestler v. Bishop of Charleston, TheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Sulander v. Syneos Health, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.