Legal Opinion

Thornburg v. Bowen

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

cited 1 Sto. Eq. Juris. § 409; 17 W. Va. 763 ; 4 Munf. 313; 6 Munf. 42; 2 Rom. Eq. Juris. § 754. cited 12 Gratt. 363 ; Beuj. Sales § 6; Code (1891) c. 50, s. 152.

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Judge :

This was a contest between Bowen, Davis & Co., execution creditors of Wilson & Beardsley, and Thomas Q. Thornburg, a purchaser of a span of horses in controversy, which resulted .in a judgment in favor of the execution-creditors in the Circuit Court of Cabell county, from which the purchaser, Thomas Q. Thornburg, has obtained this writ of error. The facts are as follows:

On the 9th day of December, 1884, the firm of Wilson & Beardsley, who owned and operated a flourmill in the city *539of Huntington, made .an assignment to William T. Thompson of all their property for the benefit of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Shelby v. GuySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. Chautauque County Bank v. . RisleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Osborne v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  5. Freeland v. FreelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  3. Bailey v. BantherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bailey v. BantherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API