Legal Opinion

Grant v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On the Proofs.

1Opinion of the CourtWilmot, J.

The claim in this case is for private property destroyed and abandoned in Arizona on the 15th of July, 18G1, by order of Captain J. N. Moore, commanding United States troops in the vicinity of Tucson. Grant was a contractor with the government for furnishing commissary and quartermaster supplies for the forts and military posts in Arizona, and in furtherance of his contract had expended large sums of money in the repair and erection of flouring mills, dwelling-houses, storehouses, shops, and corrals. He had personal property also of considerable value, consisting in part of-flour, wheat,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Caltex (Philippines), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Lloyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  5. Alexander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API