Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tillotson v. Carpenter

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1933No. File No. 7429Published

1DissentRoberts, J.

The facts are not disputed and the only question presented is the correct construction and effect to be given to the instrument which is in the form of a deed. Its granting clause reads: “For the consideration of the sum of One Dollar, in hand paid by second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and the love and: affection I bear toward my wife, Lizzie Tillotson, of said county and state, party of the second part, do hereby at the decease of my body, and during the natural life of said second party and unto the heirs of her body, if then there be such, otherwise to my heirs,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Emmerson v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Trumbauer v. RustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Brown v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876
  5. Hall v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API