Legal Opinion
Rice v. Bontjes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 19, 1926No. 16519PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Herein plaintiffs in error seek to v-acate a judgment against them and in favor of their codefendant, the Chickasaw National Bank, rendered upon said codefend-ant’s cross-petition. The action was originally begun by J. H. Bontjes, as plaintiff, against A. L. Bice, Isabelle Bice, the Chickasaw National Bank o? Purcell, and other defendants. The plaintiff sought to foreclose a real estate mortgage. Personal service of summons was had upon A. L. and Isabelle Bice anfl the “answer” day contained in said summons was the 12th day of May, 1924, and A. L. and Isabelle Bice defau’ted in their answer.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Jones v. StandiferdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Littlefield v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Oklahoma State Bank of Cushing v. BuzzardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Horath v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Curtis v. BarbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Turner v. DexterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Central Nat. Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- W. W. Bennett & Co. v. La FayetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.