United States v. Bishop
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
BOBBY R. BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Richard L. Bishop, a federal prisoner representing himself, appeals the - district court’s denial of his motion for sentence modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2), based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”). The district court denied his motion because Amendment 782 would not alter his Guideline sentencing range; thus, Mr. Bishop is ineligible for § 3582(c)(2) relief. We have construed Mr. Bishop’s pro se filings liberally, see Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 1201 n. 2 (10th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Garza v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BattleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017