Legal Opinion

United States v. Bishop

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2016No. 15-6115UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

BOBBY R. BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Richard L. Bishop, a federal prisoner representing himself, appeals the - district court’s denial of his motion for sentence modification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2), based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”). The district court denied his motion because Amendment 782 would not alter his Guideline sentencing range; thus, Mr. Bishop is ineligible for § 3582(c)(2) relief. We have construed Mr. Bishop’s pro se filings liberally, see Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 1201 n. 2 (10th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Garza v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. BattleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API