Legal Opinion

Darrin Stephens v. Made to Order, Inc. and Red Promotions, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided December 9, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02246Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 DARRIN STEPHENS, Case No. 2:25-cv-02246-RFB-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 MADE TO ORDER, INC. and RED PROMOTIONS, INC., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 7. 11 Plaintiff was granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis on November 19, 2025. ECF No. 4. 12 The Court screens the FAC under the same standard as stated in the original screening Order. Id. 13 I. Plaintiff’s Complaint 14 a. The Court Recommends Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Age and Potential Disability…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Shelley Sommatino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Hansen v. Harrah'sNevada Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API