Legal Opinion

Barbaree v. Flowers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1940No. 4 Div. 112PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Complainant (appellee here) owning a certain lot situated on the north side of Conecuh Street in Union Springs, Alabama, filed this bill against respondents, P. J. Barbaree and Mrs. M. E. Forsyth, whose lots adjoin hers on the east, to settle the boundary line between them, which is in dispute. Sections 6439-6441, Code of 1923. A fence, extending from the southwest corner of the Barbaree lot to the northwest corner of the Forsyth lot, is the present dividing line of the respective parties: complainant insisting that on the north end the fence embraces about 18 feet of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Dothard v. DensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Brantley v. HeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Shepherd v. Scott's ChapelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Turnipseed v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Duke v. WimberlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Spradling v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Hagan v. CrowleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Mims v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API