Legal Opinion

Palmer, Phinizy & Connell v. Heinzerling

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1925No. 16344PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Whetlier or not the owner of an automobile is liable for damage caused by it which results from the negligence of the person operating it depends upon whether the person driving it was the agent or servant of the owner, and engaged upon the business of the owner at the time the negligence occurred. If he was such agent and engaged upon such business, the owner is responsible for injuries to persons or property caused by his negligence in operating the automobile. Aliter if he was not such agent and was not engaged upon such business.” Rape v. Barker, 25 Ga. App. 362 (103 S. E. 171).

2. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Emery v. Atlanta Real Estate ExchangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Cannon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of CaliforniaUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Rape v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Gude & Walker v. Bailey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Morris v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Samples v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Davies v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Clifton L. Cannon, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Johnson v. FranklinDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970
  5. Jackson v. BraddyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API