Legal Opinion
Zeppelin v. Fed. Highway Admin.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 22, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–cv–1661–WJM–MEH; C/w 17–cv–1679–WJM–MEHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William J. Martinez, United States District Judge
A portion of Interstate 70 ("I-70") in northeast Denver was constructed in the *11931960s as a 1.2-mile viaduct running through and above Denver's Elyria-Swansea and Globeville neighborhoods ("Viaduct"). This structure has apparently caused concern for some time in light of its age and the increase in traffic that naturally attends population growth. Defendant Federal Highway Administration ("Highway Administration") and Intervenor-Defendant Colorado Department of Transportation ("CDOT") (together, "Defendants") have decided that the best way…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Front Range Nesting Bald Eagle Studies v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- American Cricket Premier League, LLC v. USA CricketDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Bradford v. U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Prairie Protection Colorado v. USDA APHIS Wildlife ServicesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- State of Colorado, The v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020