Legal Opinion

Rubio v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1906No. 3133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEHDEBSOM, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of .forgery, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary, hence this appeal.

Inasmuch as the sufficiency of the indictment is questioned, we will quote the charging part thereof, as follows: that appellant * * * “did then and there unlawfully, without lawful authority and with in tent to injure and defraud, did wilfully and fraudulently make a certain false instrument in writing, purporting to be the act of Pedro Moncibayes, which said false instrument is to the tenor as follows: ‘Mr. J. Hixson (meaning Mr. B. M. Hixson(…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Townser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API