Legal Opinion

In Re Bonkowski's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 3, Calendar No. 37,472PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Walter Bonkowski in June, 1930, made a will. Prior to his death he struck out of his will the name of one of the legatees and inserted the name of another. There was no re-execution of the will. The trial court held the striking out of the name of the legatee Schmidt was done with the intention of passing the legacy to legatee Gray, but by reason- of the failure to re-execute the will, this intention was defeated for want of republication, and the act of obliteration did not amount to a revocation of the will. On the other hand, appellants claim that when the name Schmidt was struck out it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolf v. BollingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Olmsted v. BussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Eschbach v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of PennimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
  5. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Worcester Bank & Trust Co. v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Schneider v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. In Re Houghten's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re McKay EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API