Legal Opinion

Victor Hugo Mesa v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2014No. 36A01-1308-MI-362PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PYLE, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Victor Hugo Mesa (“Mesa”), pro se, appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to the State of Indiana, the Office of the Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney, and the Seymour Police Department (collectively, “the State”) on the State’s eomplaint for forfeiture, which alleged that Mesa’s vehicle was purchased with proceeds from cocaine dealing.

We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether the trial court erred by ordering forfeiture of Mesa’s vehicle pursuant to a summary judgment motion and without a hearing.

FACTS

On November 7, 2011, the State filed a complaint…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jones v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Letson v. LowmasterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Sharon Gill, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Gale Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delmar P. Kuchaes v. Public Storage, Inc. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Timothy E. Huffman, Jr., $15,711.48 in Lawful United States Currency v. State of Indiana, ex. rel. Evansville-Vanderburgh County Drug Task Force (15-66385) (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API