Legal Opinion

Bruno Independent Living Aids, Inc. v. Acorn Mobility Services, Ltd., and Acorn Stairlifts, Inc., Defendants-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 11, 2005No. 04-1114, 04-1125PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Bruno Independent Living Aids, Inc. (“Bruno”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin awarding attorney fees to Acorn Mobility Services, Ltd. and Acorn Stairlifts, Inc. (collectively “Acorn”) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 for an “exceptional case,” predicated on a determination that Bruno engaged in inequitable conduct while prosecuting United States Patent 5,230,405. Bruno Indep. Living Aids, Inc. v. Acorn Mobility Servs., Ltd, 277 F.Supp.2d 965 (WD.Wis.2003). In case we were to disturb the exceptional…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Technology Licensing Corp. v. Videotek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Ferring B v. & Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Avid Identification Systems, Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API