Legal Opinion
Sangster v. Dujinski
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 18, 2003No. A03A1643PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Chief Judge.
In this personal injury action brought by Karen E. Dujinski, defendant Ricky R. Sangster, Jr. appeals from denial of his motion for new trial, renewed motion for mistrial, and motion for attorney fees based upon improper argument of counsel and violation of the trial court’s order in limine. Because the record shows a pattern of persistent violation of both OCGA § 9-10-185 and the trial court’s order limiting the evidence admissible at trial, we reverse.
This action arose from a traffic altercation during which Sangster struck Dujinski with his fist. After a two-phase trial,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Salmon v. SalmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- McEachern v. McEachernSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- All Risk Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Stoner v. EdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Georgia Department of Corrections v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Vega v. La Movida, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- State v. GillaspyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Sterling Tyrone Brown, Sr., as Surviving Spouse v. Southeastern Pain Specialists, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Universal Management Concepts, Inc. v. NoferiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.