Legal Opinion
McEachern v. McEachern
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 8, 1990No. S90A0670PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Chief Justice.
The parties were divorced following a jury trial, and the wife appeals from an award which included the marital residence, Vs of husband’s retirement benefits, and $450 per month in alimony for three years. We granted wife’s application to appeal to consider one issue: Whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence of post-separation payments by husband.
1. The trial court concluded that this court’s decision in Haselden v. Haselden, 255 Ga. 366 (338 SE2d 257) (1986), precluded testimony regarding the amount of any payments. Wife contends that under Clifton v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- McCluskey v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Walker v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Bryan v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Kicklighter v. KicklighterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Wilson v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Vega v. La Movida, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.