Legal Opinion

Landers v. Leavitt

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 20, 2005No. Civ.A. 3:04CV1988 (JCH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [Doc. NOS. 8, 10 and 21]

HALL, District Judge.

The named plaintiffs are Medicare beneficiaries who were denied coverage for stays in a skilled nursing facility. Medicare, Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq., provides for coverage for such stays. However, the Medicare statute provides for coverage only where services are “furnished an individual after transfer from a hospital in which he was an inpatient for not less than 3 consecutive days before his discharge from the hospital in connection with such transfer.”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Landers Ex Rel. Landers v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Estate of Gardner v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  3. Estate of Landers v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API