Landers v. Leavitt
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [Doc. NOS. 8, 10 and 21]
HALL, District Judge.
The named plaintiffs are Medicare beneficiaries who were denied coverage for stays in a skilled nursing facility. Medicare, Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq., provides for coverage for such stays. However, the Medicare statute provides for coverage only where services are “furnished an individual after transfer from a hospital in which he was an inpatient for not less than 3 consecutive days before his discharge from the hospital in connection with such transfer.”…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Landers Ex Rel. Landers v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Estate of Gardner v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Estate of Landers v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009