Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. Mammina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determina*401tion of the Town of North Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals, dated August 14, 1996, which directed the petitioner to prepare and submit a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in connection with his application to obtain a variance for a nonconforming use, the appeal is from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 30, 1997, which denied the appellants’ motion to dismiss the petition, annulled the determination, and remitted the matter to the appellants for further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Briedis v. Village of Tuxedo ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Adamag Realty Corp. v. DiamanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laurel Realty v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Haberman v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Intermor v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API