Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Cox

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1905No. 5,024PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erom Henry Circuit Court; John M. Morris, Judge. Action by Arthur L. Cox and others against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant company appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, P. J.-

Action in attachment, in which a garnishee summons was issued against appellant; the property in appellant’s possession being then in this State, but in transit to a place without the State. On April 9, 1901, appellees Fleischman and Currie executed to appellees Cox, Lamb and Beeson their promissory note for $1,163.38, payable in ninety days, and, to secure the note, executed a chattel mortgage on some horses, harness and wheel scoops in Wayne county. The mortgage was duly recorded April 11. No payment having been made on the note, on Sunday, May 19, 1901, the payees filed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Stiles v. Davis & BartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Bates v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Adams v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. YoheIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Hale Center v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. Webb Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Malott v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Merrill v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API