Legal Opinion

Max 327, Inc. v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1992No. 8911-06826; CA A68826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant city in this action for specific performance of a renewal option in a commercial lease. We affirm.

In February, 1988, Hamid Asgari and Kamy Asgari leased retail space in the Morrison Park East Parking structure. In July, 1988, the Asgaris assigned their interest to plaintiff. In March, 1989, plaintiff and defendant executed an addendum to the lease which, inter alia, granted plaintiff an option to renew, “provided that [plaintiff] is not then in material default hereunder.” On July 12, 1989, plaintiffs attorney sent defendant a letter stating its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Heinzel v. BackstromOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wallstreet Properties, Inc. v. GassnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. CrockettNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Caro v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. CrockettNevada Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API