Legal Opinion
Litinsky v. Querard
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 1984No. 83CA0339PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
Defendant Natalia M. Querard appeals the denial of her motion for preliminary injunction and entry of an oral order which restrained her from using the name “Sloane Gallery of Art” and ordered the delivery of certain personal property to plaintiff Mina Litinsky. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Querard, along with her husband, John R. Querard, was co-developer of a real estate project in downtown Denver known as the Elephant Corral Office Complex. The Complex contained approximately 16 separate offices, including the Sloane Gallery of Art (Gallery), which displayed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- In Re the Marriage of MannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- American Television & Communications Corp. v. ManningColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Allen v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Monatt v. Pioneer Astro Industries, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Atmel Corp. v. VITESEE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Phoenix Capital, Inc. v. DowellColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Governor's Ranch Professional Center, Ltd. v. Mercy of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Friends of Denver Parks, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.