United States v. Kissel
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Gustav E. Kissel and Thomas B. Harned, indicted with the American Sugar Refining Company and others, filed pleas in bar to the indictment, to which the government demurred.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, District Judge.
These are demurrers filed by the government to pleas in bar interposed by the defendants Kissel and Harned to the indictment. The indictment charges the defendants with a conspiracy in restraint of interstate commerce, in violation of Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200), commonly called the “Sherman Act.” The defendants are the American Sugar Refining Company and its directors, and certain other persons. The indictment alleges, in substance, that the defendants conspired to prevent the Pennsylvania Sugar Refining Company from doing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. IrvineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ware v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Ex parte BlackDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1906
- United States v. BradfordDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1905
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Breese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
- United States v. PattersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1912
- People v. IngramCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1973
- United States v. PattenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.