Scheidt v. Schermerhorn
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Bond, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
Four bills of exception appear in the record in this ease, though but one of them is at all vital to the decision of the case.
The first and third bills were taken to the rulings of the lower Court upon evidence, which rulings were correct.
The case was heard on a motion to strike out a. judgment, made after the term at which, the judgment had been entered. The judgment was founded on an attachment by original process-, issued upon the ground that Charles B. and Kitty W. Jester had disposed of, or was about to dispose of their property for the purpose of defrauding their creditors. In order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abell v. Simon ex rel. SimonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Coulbourn v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Smith v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Pattison v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tasea Investment Corp. v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Woodcock v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- C.I.T. Corporation v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Tizer v. TizerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932