Tizer v. Tizer

Parke, J.,

filed a dissenting, opinion as follows:

'The facts on this record are stated in the decision of the <court. They present this situation. A and B, his wife, are .seised and possessed as tenants by entireties of X, a lot of .land; and O and D, his wife, are seised and possessed as tenants by entireties of Y, a contiguous lot of land. These lots are improved by a building which covers both lots. Although the building is upon both lots, the division line between lots X and Y is the property line dividing the ownership of the building, so the improvement, which is a part of the realty, is…