Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert Clement Furtney III
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 19, 1972No. 18515PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered in the district court for utterance of a counterfeit $20 Federal Reserve note with intent to defraud. 18 U.S.C. § 472.
Appellant attempted to pass the $20 bill at a Pittsburgh bar in payment for a drink. Upon receipt of the note the bartender discerned that it was counterfeit and alerted an off-duty policeman who immediately arrested appellant. These facts were not challenged. Thus, to sustain a conviction under § 472, it remained for the prosecution to establish only that at the time appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Ronald Raymond Ravich and Edward McConnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Shelby Louis PollackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Richard Seader and Thomas Ray SandellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. KillebrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- United States v. Harold Tucker MatlockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. KulpDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Michael Jerome Colclough, United States of America v. John Lawrence Sullivan, Lester Bromell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Cureton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.