Legal Opinion
Warner v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 17, 1991No. S-3478, S-3805 and S-4148PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This appeal is a consolidation of three cases. Each appellant asserted a surety fund claim before the Alaska Real Estate Commission (Commission) against a licensed real estate broker or salesperson. The Commission denied each claim as untimely under the one year statute of limitations it had established by regulation 12 AAC 64.295. The superior courts which reviewed these cases affirmed. We hold 12 AAC 64.295 void, and reverse the dismissals of appellants’ claims. As to all other issues, we affirm.
I
We begin with an overview of the Real Estate Surety Fund Act,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Beran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Fahey v. Cook County Police Department Merit BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- O'CALLAGHAN v. RueAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Mechanical Contractors of Alaska, Inc. v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- State, Department of Revenue v. OSG Bulk Ships, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.