Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Walcott

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 1, 1879PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

This is a motion to quash a complaint, because the warrant issued thereon was not under the seal of the District Court to which it was made returnable. The fact, that the seal upon the warrant was not the seal of the court was conceded, if competent and admissible. The complaint was made to a special justice of the court by name, and the warrant was. issued by him under his own hand and seal, and was made returnable to the First District Court of Bristol. The words of the attestation clause in the warrant are, “ Witness my hand and seal at Mansfield.” It does not purport to have been issued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. WolcottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riverland Oil Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API