Legal Opinion

Lugardo v. Folkes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*757Special Term did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to open the plaintiffs’ default in serving a verified bill of particulars within 60 days after service upon them of a copy of the conditional preclusion order (Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509; Ferrigno v St. Charles Hosp., 86 AD2d 594). Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the lack of compliance with the terms of the order was excusable. Specifically, although there are four plaintiffs in this case, there were no extensive records to be compiled or persons to be interviewed due to the limited nature of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schicchi v. J. A. Green Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Amodeo v. RadlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Wheeler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Amodeo v. RadlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Ferrigno v. St. Charles HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stojowski v. Fair Oaks Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Bacogiannis v. SayanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. In re MirmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API