Legal Opinion

Amodeo v. Radler

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1983PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiffs failed to establish any merit to their cause of action. Failing that, it was proper for the court to grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Indig v Finkelstein, 23 NY2d 728.)

*1003It is thus unnecessary for us, at this time, to address the recently enacted amendments to the CPLR to allow the lower courts to exercise discretion “to excuse delay or default resulting from law office failure.” (CPLR 2005, 3012, subd [d].)

Chief Judge Cooke and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Indig v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. St. Barnabas HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Kel Management Corp. v. Rogers & WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Salch v. ParatoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Brann v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API