Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. City of Crawfordsville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1905No. 20,303PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Montgomery Circuit Court; Jere West, Judge. Prosecution by tbe City of Crawfordsville against the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company for the violation of a municipal ordinance. Prom a judgment for $10, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

Suit by appellee to recover a penalty for the violation of a city ordinance requiring the lighting of street intersections.

*72The act of March 4, 1893 (Acts 1893, p. 302, §5173 Burns 1901), grants to cities, for the security and safety of persons from running trains, the power to require, by ordinance, railroad companies to maintain, at the points where the railroad track crosses the streets of the city, the same kind of lights maintained by the city, on all nights that the common council may direct. The above act effects a delegation of police power to cities, and the power granted is limited…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Champer v. City of GreencastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. City of Shelbyville v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. City of ConnersvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Booth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. City of HartfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Town of SalemIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Vandalia Railroad v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Town of SalemIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API