Legal Opinion

Carthage Transfer & Storage Co. v. Paulzer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1925No. 13851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LYONS, C.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff had judgment against defendant for $500, damages growing out of an automobile collision. Plaintiff’s car was repaired.

The court instructed the jury that the measure of damages was:

•‘Tie difference between tie reasonable cash market value of plaintiff’s oar immediately before and at the tinm of the collision, and the reasonable cash market value of said car after same had been repaired, less the reasonablie cost of such repairs, and the reasonable value of the use of the car, if any, while the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Weleetka Light & Water Co. v. NorthropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. QuallsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Forrest E. Gilmore Co. v. HurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. J. R. Adams, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API