Legal Opinion

Moore v. City Council of the City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1922No. Civ. No. 4000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel respondents to advertise, within fifteen days from July 5, 1922, a proposed amendment to the charter of the city of Los Angeles. On application made to this court in the first instance, an alternative writ of mandate was issued, and thereafter respondents appeared and filed their answer.

From the uncontroverted averments of the petition and the stipulations of the parties, the following facts are made to appear: On July 5, 1922, a petition, signed by more than fifteen per cent of the registered electors of the city of Los Angeles, requesting the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bankers Life Insurance v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. Eureka Consolidated Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Porter v. BrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Banks v. McClureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Harris v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. TwoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Anglo-American Direct Tea Trading Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
  3. James v. ChapmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ault v. Council of City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Ault v. Council of City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API