Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Tiner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Dakota county, Crosby, J., presiding, overruling a general demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action for money “advanced, delivered, and paid” to defendant by plaintiff’s intestate. The material allegations of the complaint are “that said George Varían died intestate, in Dakota county, on the 17th of May, 1882, and that on the 20th of November, 1882, the plaintiff was, by the judge of probate of said Dakota county, duly appointed administrator of the estate of said George Varían, and thereupon the plaintiff duly qualified as such administrator, and ever since has been, and now is, the duly qualified and acting administrator .of said estate;” that during his lifetime, and about the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Harris v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Peets v. BrattNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Grignon v. ShopeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hamilton v. McIndooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Falkner v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Toner v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API