Legal Opinion

Eclipse Lawn Mower Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1932No. K—40PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The plaintiff’s case is based entirely, upon the contention that there was no valid waiver on file with the commissioner which authorized him to assess the additional tax on May 15, 1924, and to make collection thereof on May 26, 1924. It is our opinion that this claim cannot be sustained. The facts show that the statutory period of limitation within which the commissioner could assess and collect an additional tax for 1918 without a waiver expired April 17, 1924. On January 28, 1924, about four months prior to the date of assessment and while the case was under consideration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Sabin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Stange v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  3. United States v. Alene Conry, United States of America v. Leonard M. ConryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Atlantic Mills of Rhode Island v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  5. James S. Murray, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API