Legal Opinion

Columbus Ins. v. Curtenius

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois

Decided October 15, 1853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At law.

1Opinion of the Court

DRUMMOND, Distinct Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs as insurers of a canal-boat and cargo of wheat, which *187were lost by tbe canal-boat’s striking tbe piers of tbe bridge built by tbe defendants, near Peoria, while on tbe passage from Peru to St. Louis, and which loss tbe plaintiffs have been obliged to pay. Tbe canal-boat was towed by tbe steamer Falcon at tbe time of tbe loss, 19tk March, 1S49. Tbe declaration alleges that tbe defendants placed piers in tbe principal channel of tbe Illinois river, a navigable river free to all tbe citizens of tbe United States, so as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Washington Bridge Co. v. State ex rel. ColbornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DebsU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1894
  2. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. FrostIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Missouri River Packet Co. v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Columbus Ins. v. Peoria Bridge Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1853
  5. Hatch v. Wallamet Iron Bridge Co.United States Circuit Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API